Examiner Anthony G. Martin
to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a
smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable.
Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a
number of Constitutional issues. Critics have complained that much
if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional
roadblocks on the power of the federal government.
Photo/Keith Srakocic). Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court.
certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the
venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly
flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right
to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an
tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated
by Justice Sam Alito, who
publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,'
when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling.
As it has
turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the
executive and the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama
publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued
to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known
Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200
even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that
is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh. And it is no accident
that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated
recently that he
has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.'
the Court has had enough.
Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends
to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to
high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any one of these important
issues could potentially cripple the Administration.
Such a thing
would be long overdue.
is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the
federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something.
And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to
purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim.
The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from
such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen
could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive
ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'
sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information
concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise serious questions
about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes
far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves
possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut,
while Obama was a high school student inHawaii. And that is only
the tip of the iceberg.
several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of
interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many
Administration officials, if not the President himself, in hot water
with the Court. Frankly, in the years this writer has observed
politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption
of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years. Nixon and
the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers
that populate this Administration.
the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of
the Obama DOJ to sue the state of Arizona. That, too, could send
the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the
Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.
the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards
tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the
Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New
Black Panther Party. The group is caught on tape committing
felonies by atempting
to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls.
whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the
deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those
who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers,
who have been caught on tape calling
for the murder of white people and their babies.
This one is a
biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if
the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the
Constitution and the Bill of Rights.